THE INFLUENCE OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND JOB SATISFACTION ON TURNOVER INTENTION WITH WORK ENGAGEMENT AS A MEDIATING VARIABLE

Authors

  • Suci Indahwati Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Asep Gunawan Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Risdianto Risdianto Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31959/jm.v15i3.4051

Abstract

Introduction: Turnover intention constitutes a key hurdle for human resource management in Indonesia's labour-intensive manufacturing sector, notably the textile industry, as it grapples with global competitive dynamics, a surge in imports, and a reduction in market demand expected by 2025. These factors urge businesses to improve their human resource management, especially by prioritising procedural justice and job satisfaction. It is conjectured that these factors do not consistently have a direct relationship with turnover intention but are mediated by work engagement.
Methods: This analysis applies a quantitative framework, utilising simple random sampling to choose 286 individuals, as derived from the Slovin formula. Empirical information was elicited through a survey instrument employing a five-category Likert response format. The collected observations were subsequently subjected to Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), with SmartPLS serving as the analytical platform for estimating the structural relationships among the constructs.
Results: The analysis showed that procedural justice exerted a significant direct effect on turnover intention, although in a positive rather than the hypothesised negative direction, whereas job satisfaction showed no significant direct effect. Employee work engagement appeared to be primarily driven by job satisfaction and, in turn, significantly reduced turnover intention. Instead, the influence of job satisfaction on turnover intention was evident only when it operated through work engagement, identifying this construct as the sole mediating mechanism within the proposed model. In contrast, procedural justice did not influence turnover intention through this mediating mechanism.
Closing Remarks and Advice: These observations substantiate that procedural justice is the foremost direct predictor of employee turnover intention in terms of effect size, though its influence was positive rather than protective, while job satisfaction affects turnover intention chiefly through work engagement, which in turn significantly reduces employees' intention to leave. Firms are urged to invest deliberately in work engagement, through meaningful feedback, autonomy, and recognition of job satisfaction, as the psychological pathway to increased employee retention, while further investigating why greater procedural fairness coincided with higher turnover intention in this sample. Further research should replicate the work engagement–turnover intention association, confirmed as negative in this study, and widen the sample range to include various textile companies.

Keywords: Human Resources, Job Satisfaction, Procedural Justice, Turnover Intention, Work Engagement

Author Biographies

Asep Gunawan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon

Lecturer at the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon, Indonesia. Research interests include Human Resource Management, Organizational Behavior, and Management.

Risdianto Risdianto, Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon

Lecturer at the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon, Indonesia. Research interests include Human Resource Management, Organizational Behavior, and Management.

References

Atmaja, D. R., & Marika, L. (2024). The Influence of Procedural Justice on Work Engagement And Turnover Intention. Majalah Ilmiah Bijak, 21(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.31334/bijak.v21i1.3679

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model : state of the art. 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Callaghan, M. O. (2026). The impact of procedural justice on employee turnover intentions and the role of two mediators. 21(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-03-2023-1822

Gharbi, H., Aliane, N., Al Falah, K. A., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2022). You Really Affect Me: The Role of Social Influence in the Relationship between Procedural Justice and Turnover Intention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095162

Hair, Hult, L., Ringle, N., & Law, R. (2014). Hair , J . F . Jr ., Hult , G . T . M ., Ringle , C . M ., Sarstedt , M . ( 2014 ). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling ( PLS-SEM ). Sage Publications . 211–213.

Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4(4), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90013-0

Lubis, R. A., Lubis, Z., & Patisina. (2024). The Role of Job Satisfaction on Turnover Intention with Employee Engagement as a Mediating Variable. 13(3), 1029–1048.

Maemar Chadavid, S., & Mayasari, I. (2019). Anteseden Keterikatan Karyawan. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 20(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.30596/jimb.v20i2.3396

Mengmeng, L., Abdul Aziz, N. A., & Omar, M. K. (2025). Unveiling of Key Factors Influencing Turnover Intention: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(2), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v15-i2/24609

Muchtadin, M. (2022). Hubungan antara Work Engagement dengan Turnover Intention pada Pekerja Generasi Milenial di Jabodetabek The Relationship between Work Engagement and Turnover Intention for Millennial Generation Workers in Jabodetabek Tingkat pergantian atau keluar masukny. 13(3), 377–391.

Nabila, V., & Budiono. (2023). Pengaruh job satisfaction terhadap employee performance melalui work engagement pada karyawan. 13, 242–254.

Nadziroh, U., & Nugrohoseno, D. (2023). Volume 11 Nomor 1 Halaman 418-432 Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Pengaruh procedural justice terhadap work engagement melalui organizational trust dan organizational commitment sebagai variabel intervening. 11, 418–432.

Pratama, H. S. (2025). Pengaruh Work Engagement terhadap Turnover Intention Operator Alat Berat PT MSM Nirwana Putra Kota Bekasi. 5(3), 1608–1619.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior (15th ed). Pearson Education, Inc.

Safitri, A., & Suharmono. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Otonomi Kerja (Job Autonomy), Keterlibatan Kerja (Work Engagement), Dan Kepuasan Kerja (Job Satisfaction) Terhadap Keinginan Untuk Keluar (Turnover Intention). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–14.

Salsabila, N., & Fernando Tumanggor, B. (2023). Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Tingkat Turnover Intention Pegawai Di PT PKSS Cabang Jakarta 1. Jurnal Sumber Daya Aparatur, 5(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.32834/jsda.v5i2.646

Saragih, R. S., Manalu, A. S., Sirait, E., Purba, A. T., Sihombing, L. L., & Simarmata, P. P. (2026). Employee Engagement and Work – Life Balance Effects on Turnover Intention : The Intervening Role of Rewards among Gen Z Employees. (November 2025).

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471

Sunyoto, D., Saksono, Y., & Ariyani, F. (2023). Peran Keadilan Distributif Dan Keadilan Prosedural Pada Efektifitas Organisasi Dengan Keterikatan Karyawan Sebagai Mediasi. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(4), 2759–2771.

Suseno, K., & Yanuar, Y. (2025). Faktor internal dengan mediasi work engagement dalam mengurangi turnover intention PT ABC. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 9(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmbk.v9i2.33902

Widyaningsih, Z., & Pramono, R. B. (2025). HUBUNGAN ANTARA JOB SATISFACTION DENGAN WORK ENGAGEMENT PADA KARYAWAN PT. X DI KUDUS, JAWA TENGAH. 12(12), 4707–4720.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-24

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)